Thursday, September 07, 2006

Stout v. Commissioner, Social Sec. Admin., 454 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir. 2006)(Reversed and remanded because the ALJ failed to provide any reasons for rejecting competent lay testimony, and because we conclude that error was not harmless, substantial evidence does not support the Commissioner’s decision that Stout can perform his previous work as a vine pruner. Attorney ktucker@stc-law.com

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home